Outcome: Denied / dismissed
-
Decision: Grovo Holsteins, Highfield Farms, and Verdonk v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to not reconsider the cancellation of fluid quota. The appellants argued that the decision was made without proper consideration of the Bari Cheese case implications.
-
Decision: Loveridge Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to deny reinstatement of Manufactured Milk Quota. Loveridge Farms Ltd. argued for exemption under the “catastrophe” clause of the BCMMB’s Consolidated Order due to not meeting the 90% quota requirement. The decision was related to the BCMMB Consolidated Order.
-
Decision: Mainland Dairymen’s Association v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision not to refund levies on milk deliveries used for industrial purposes beyond the 1989/90 market sharing quota. The decision was related to the BCMMB’s policy on levy refunds.
-
Decision: Massie v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
The appeal concerns whether Massie is a “person aggrieved” under section 11(1) of the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act, following the BCMMB’s decision to enter into an agreement with Birchwood Dairies and the Canadian Dairy Commission. The decision was related to the allocation of milk production and associated agreements.
-
Decision: Barichello and Joamy Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s Milk Market Sharing Order 31 decision to address excess butterfat production. Appellants’ dissatisfaction with levy structure affecting high butterfat producers. The decision was related to the Milk Market Sharing Order 31.
-
Decision: Jori Holsteins, Limbrant Holsteins, and Bland v. The British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to suspend all transfers of fluid and market-sharing quota. The appellants challenged the suspension related to BCMMB’s news bulletin of August 25, 1993. The decision was related to the suspension of quota transfers following a B.C. Supreme Court decision.
-
Decision: Foremost Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMB’s decision regarding an application for costs by the BCMMB. The appellant, Foremost Foods Ltd., contested the costs related to a previous decision on freight charges.
-
Decision: Foremost Foods Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to not reimburse freight charges. Foremost Foods Ltd. claimed errors of fact, law, and jurisdiction regarding freight charges and milk classification. Preliminary issues included timeliness of the appeal and jurisdiction to refund charges.
-
Decision: Gemser Bros Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to reduce manufactured milk quota. Gemser Bros Farm Ltd. challenged the reduction communicated in a letter dated January 11, 1995.
-
Decision: Janmaat v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board
Appeal of BCMMB’s decision regarding the refund of over quota levies for the dairy year 1989-1990. The decision was related to the jurisdiction of the British Columbia Marketing Board to hear the appeal.