Industry: Vegetable
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Correction to Phase II submission
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. files a correction to its December 1 submission in the “Bad Faith” supervisory review, clarifying which lawsuit Commissioner Gerrard was named in.
-
Submission: B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Phase 2
The BCVMC provides written submissions regarding phase 2 of the supervisory review, asserting that Prokam Enterprises Ltd.’s allegations were made strategically to undermine the commission and proposing a charge for legal fees against Prokam.
-
Submission of hearing counsel — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity
Hearing counsel submits recommendations to BCFIRB regarding Prokam Enterprises Ltd.’s allegations of bad faith and unlawful conduct. The submission addresses Prokam’s motivations and suggests measures to restore orderly marketing and confidence in the regulated vegetable industry.
-
Directive: BCFIRB to regulated marketing boards and commissions — Reporting on New Entrant Programs in the Public Accountability and Reporting Project
BCFIRB outlines a phased approach for mandatory reporting on New Entrant Programs in the Public Accountability and Reporting Project. Starting with the 2023 report, supply-managed boards must describe NEPs, set goals, and provide data. By 2024, they must also develop metrics to measure progress towards these goals.
-
BCVMC’s PARP report for 2023 reporting period
2023 report from the BC Vegetable Marketing Commission for Public Accountability and Reporting Project (PARP)
-
Reply: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. − Agency Prior Approval Process
MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. submits reply to Windset/GGFI’s supplemental submissions, objecting to their arguments against MPL BC’s agency application and emphasizing compliance with BCFIRB’s Supervisory Review objectives.
-
Submission: Windset Farms and Greenhouse Grown Foods Inc. − MPL BC Agency Designation Review
Windset Farms and Greenhouse Grown Foods Inc. submit arguments against the designation of MPL BC as an agency, citing lack of trust and failure to meet required factors for agency designation.
-
Submission: Creekside Hothouse Ltd. to BCFIRB — MPL BC Distributors Inc. agency designation prior approval process
Creekside Hothouse Ltd. submits a response to BCFIRB’s request for supplemental written submissions regarding the implications of the ruling on MPL BC’s agency designation and voluntary reporting requirements.
-
Supplemental Submission − BCVMC on MPL Agency Designation
The BCVMC submits a supplemental response regarding the implications of the January 25, 2023 ruling on the designation of MPL BC as an agency, including voluntary reporting requirements.
-
Submission: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. − Implications of Supervisory Review Ruling on Agency Designation
MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. submits supplementary information on the implications of the January 25, 2023 ruling in the Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activity Supervisory Review on its agency designation. (2021-2024 Review of Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activities