Industry: Vegetable
-
Summary PARP report for 2024 reporting period
BCFIRB’s annual Public Accountability and Reporting Project summary report, based on the regulated marketing boards and commissions’ individual reports for the 2024 reporting period.
-
Update: BCFIRB to regulated marketing boards and commissions — Timeline revisions for commodity board and commission submissions for the 2024 Public Accountability and Reporting Program
BCFIRB outlines revised submission deadlines for the 2024 Public Accountability and Reporting Program (PARP) for various commodity boards and commissions. The new deadlines, based on input from the boards, aim to ensure more timely publication of the PARP Summary Report.
-
Dismissal: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s reconsideration decision to dismiss. Prokam Enterprises Ltd. withdrew its appeal, leading to the dismissal of the case.
-
Decision: Mucci International Marketing Inc v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to summarily dismiss a request to designate Mucci International Marketing Inc as an agency. The appellant withdrew their appeal, leading to its dismissal.
-
Decision: CFP Marketing Corporation v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to dismiss CFP Marketing Corporation’s application for an agency license. The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant.
-
Dismissal: Red Sun Farms v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to summarily dismiss a request to designate Red Sun Farms as an agency. The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant, leading to its dismissal.
-
Dismissal: British Columbia Greenhouse Growers Association v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to suspend payments to the British Columbia Greenhouse Growers Association. The appeal was withdrawn, leading to its dismissal.
-
Decision: Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Phase 2
BCFIRB decision on the question of whether Prokam Enterprises Ltd. advanced its claims in bad faith. The decision includes orders for Prokam’s delivery allocation and license class to be reviewed through a transparent process, mandatory quarterly reporting and restrictions on Mr. Dhillon’s involvement with a designated agency.
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Phase II submission regarding Prokam’s Delivery Allocation
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. submits its Phase II position in the “Bad Faith” supervisory review, supporting Hearing Counsel’s recommendation that the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission (VMC) must determine Prokam’s Delivery Allocation.
-
Submission: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Phase 2
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. submits written arguments challenging the jurisdiction and procedural fairness of Phase II of the supervisory review, which examines allegations of bad faith and unlawful conduct.