This is not the document

Sometimes you may land on this page when you are trying to open a specific BCFIRB document. This page is not the document.

How to find the document

  • Letter: Mitha Law Group to BCFIRB — Recommendation to End Phase Two of Supervisory Review for MPL

    Mitha Law Group recommends ending Phase Two of the Supervisory Review for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc., citing MPL’s decision to terminate its civil claim and commit to the B.C. regulated vegetable sector.

  • Supervisory rule: Protection of privacy and confidentiality in BCFIRB supervisory processes and reviews

    BCFIRB outlines additional rules for managing sensitive and confidential information under its supervisory mandate, emphasizing transparency and inclusiveness while allowing for non-disclosure orders in certain circumstances.

  • Submission: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. to BCVMC − Agency Class I License Application Response

    MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. responds to industry stakeholder comments on its Agency Class I License application, emphasizing the benefits of granting the license for economic stability and supply chain opportunities for B.C. producers. The submission addresses concerns about competition, market disruption, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

  • Schedule B: Category expansion — Redacted

    SUNSET reports on its greenhouse innovations, highlighting developments in the tomato and pepper segments, including the introduction of the first branded tomato and high-flavor snacking peppers.

  • Schedule A: Agency application slide deck — Redcated

    Mastronardi Produce outlines its strategy to expand its greenhouse vegetable market presence by leveraging proprietary varieties and distribution networks to displace imports and access global markets.

  • Ruling: BCFIRB to MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. — Conclusion of Phase II Supervisory Review on Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activity

    BCFIRB concludes Phase II of the Supervisory Review for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc., following steps taken by MPL to address the impact of its conduct on orderly marketing and the BCVMC.

  • Reply: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. − Agency Prior Approval Process

    MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. submits reply to Windset/GGFI’s supplemental submissions, objecting to their arguments against MPL BC’s agency application and emphasizing compliance with BCFIRB’s Supervisory Review objectives.

  • Submission: Creekside Hothouse Ltd. to BCFIRB — MPL BC Distributors Inc. agency designation prior approval process

    Creekside Hothouse Ltd. submits a response to BCFIRB’s request for supplemental written submissions regarding the implications of the ruling on MPL BC’s agency designation and voluntary reporting requirements.

  • Supplemental Submission − BCVMC on MPL Agency Designation

    The BCVMC submits a supplemental response regarding the implications of the January 25, 2023 ruling on the designation of MPL BC as an agency, including voluntary reporting requirements.

  • Submission: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. − Implications of Supervisory Review Ruling on Agency Designation

    MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. submits supplementary information on the implications of the January 25, 2023 ruling in the Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activity Supervisory Review on its agency designation. (2021-2024 Review of Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activities

1. Search for the document

  1. Use the search box at the top of the page
  2. Enter the document title
  3. Select Documents to limit your results (if necessary)
  4. Choose the document from the results list to open the PDF.

2. Browse all BCFIRB documents

You can also browse all available documents and decisions.

From that page, you can:

  • Filter by category (such as Animal custody appeal)
  • Filter by document type (such as Decision or Correspondence)
  • Filter by keyword
  • Letter: Mitha Law Group to BCFIRB — Recommendation to End Phase Two of Supervisory Review for MPL

    Mitha Law Group recommends ending Phase Two of the Supervisory Review for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc., citing MPL’s decision to terminate its civil claim and commit to the B.C. regulated vegetable sector.

  • Supervisory rule: Protection of privacy and confidentiality in BCFIRB supervisory processes and reviews

    BCFIRB outlines additional rules for managing sensitive and confidential information under its supervisory mandate, emphasizing transparency and inclusiveness while allowing for non-disclosure orders in certain circumstances.

  • Submission: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. to BCVMC − Agency Class I License Application Response

    MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. responds to industry stakeholder comments on its Agency Class I License application, emphasizing the benefits of granting the license for economic stability and supply chain opportunities for B.C. producers. The submission addresses concerns about competition, market disruption, and compliance with regulatory requirements.

  • Schedule B: Category expansion — Redacted

    SUNSET reports on its greenhouse innovations, highlighting developments in the tomato and pepper segments, including the introduction of the first branded tomato and high-flavor snacking peppers.

  • Schedule A: Agency application slide deck — Redcated

    Mastronardi Produce outlines its strategy to expand its greenhouse vegetable market presence by leveraging proprietary varieties and distribution networks to displace imports and access global markets.

  • Ruling: BCFIRB to MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. — Conclusion of Phase II Supervisory Review on Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activity

    BCFIRB concludes Phase II of the Supervisory Review for MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc., following steps taken by MPL to address the impact of its conduct on orderly marketing and the BCVMC.

  • Reply: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. − Agency Prior Approval Process

    MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. submits reply to Windset/GGFI’s supplemental submissions, objecting to their arguments against MPL BC’s agency application and emphasizing compliance with BCFIRB’s Supervisory Review objectives.

  • Submission: Creekside Hothouse Ltd. to BCFIRB — MPL BC Distributors Inc. agency designation prior approval process

    Creekside Hothouse Ltd. submits a response to BCFIRB’s request for supplemental written submissions regarding the implications of the ruling on MPL BC’s agency designation and voluntary reporting requirements.

  • Supplemental Submission − BCVMC on MPL Agency Designation

    The BCVMC submits a supplemental response regarding the implications of the January 25, 2023 ruling on the designation of MPL BC as an agency, including voluntary reporting requirements.

  • Submission: MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. − Implications of Supervisory Review Ruling on Agency Designation

    MPL British Columbia Distributors Inc. submits supplementary information on the implications of the January 25, 2023 ruling in the Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activity Supervisory Review on its agency designation. (2021-2024 Review of Allegations of Bad Faith and Unlawful Activities