This is not the document

Sometimes you may land on this page when you are trying to open a specific BCFIRB document. This page is not the document.

How to find the document

Use the following information to help you select the correct file:

  • Dismissal: Rittenhouse Produce v. British Columbia Interior Vegetable Marketing Board

    Appeal of BC Interior Vegetable Marketing Board’s decision to deny Rittenhouse Produce the right to market carrots as in previous years.

  • Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Appellant withdrew its appeal of Order 10/03(a).

  • Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Letter regarding appellant withdrawal of appeal of Order 10/03(a).

  • Decision: Vanmar Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of the BCCMB’s decision to reduce production allotment for late levy payment. During appeal, BCCMB agreed to reverse the reduction and grant all requested remedies. Vanmar sought costs, but BCFIRB found the dispute had been settled and declined to award costs.

  • Decision: Hinch v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    Withdrawn appeal of the BC SPCA claim for seizure costs.

  • Preliminary decision: Hinch v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    Procedural decision regarding the withdrawal of an appeal concerning costs of seizure. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s acceptance of reimbursement for the costs.

  • Decision: Way-Jac Holdings v. The British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCCMB’s decision regarding shipment restrictions to the Lower Mainland. Way-Jac Holdings contested a threatened quota reduction if shipments were made before January 1, 1995. The decision was related to the Board’s letter dated July 12, 1993.

  • Decision: Van Der Wereld v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Withdrawal of appeal of BCCMB’s Order #213 decision. The appellant’s concerns were addressed by a subsequent order adjusting roaster quota cycles. The decision was related to the appellant’s satisfaction with the new order.

  • Decision: Arnold v. BC SPCA

    Appeal of seizure of 59 dogs and 14 exotic birds. BCFIRB dismissed the appeal after the appellant withdrew the appeal.

  • Decision: Kang v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    BCFIRB dismissal order confirming withdrawal of an appeal under the PCAA regarding seizure of one dog and one cat.

1. Search for the document

  1. Use the search box at the top of the page
  2. Enter the document title
  3. Select Documents to limit your results (if necessary)
  4. Choose the document from the results list to open the PDF.

2. Browse all BCFIRB documents

You can also browse all available documents and decisions.

From that page, you can:

  • Filter by category (such as Animal custody appeal)
  • Filter by document type (such as Decision or Correspondence)
  • Filter by keyword

  • Dismissal: Rittenhouse Produce v. British Columbia Interior Vegetable Marketing Board

    Appeal of BC Interior Vegetable Marketing Board’s decision to deny Rittenhouse Produce the right to market carrots as in previous years.

  • Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Appellant withdrew its appeal of Order 10/03(a).

  • Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Letter regarding appellant withdrawal of appeal of Order 10/03(a).

  • Decision: Vanmar Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of the BCCMB’s decision to reduce production allotment for late levy payment. During appeal, BCCMB agreed to reverse the reduction and grant all requested remedies. Vanmar sought costs, but BCFIRB found the dispute had been settled and declined to award costs.

  • Decision: Hinch v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    Withdrawn appeal of the BC SPCA claim for seizure costs.

  • Preliminary decision: Hinch v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    Procedural decision regarding the withdrawal of an appeal concerning costs of seizure. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s acceptance of reimbursement for the costs.

  • Decision: Way-Jac Holdings v. The British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCCMB’s decision regarding shipment restrictions to the Lower Mainland. Way-Jac Holdings contested a threatened quota reduction if shipments were made before January 1, 1995. The decision was related to the Board’s letter dated July 12, 1993.

  • Decision: Van Der Wereld v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Withdrawal of appeal of BCCMB’s Order #213 decision. The appellant’s concerns were addressed by a subsequent order adjusting roaster quota cycles. The decision was related to the appellant’s satisfaction with the new order.

  • Decision: Arnold v. BC SPCA

    Appeal of seizure of 59 dogs and 14 exotic birds. BCFIRB dismissed the appeal after the appellant withdrew the appeal.

  • Decision: Kang v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    BCFIRB dismissal order confirming withdrawal of an appeal under the PCAA regarding seizure of one dog and one cat.