Outcome: Withdrawn
-
Dismissal: BCCGA v BCCMB – Dismissal Order
An appeal with respect to the November 19, 2021 Mainstream Pricing Order for Period A-173 Pricing Order #164 and the November 24, 2021, Exceptional Circumstances Decision.
-
Dismissal: Plank v Pacific Pride Chicks – Dismissal Order
Complaint regarding noise from a macerator on a chicken farm. Farm replaced machinery and noise issue was resolved. Complainant withdrew complaint.
-
Dismissal: PPPABC (x6) v BCCMB – Dismissal Order
Withdrawal of six appeals from the Primary Poultry Processors Association of BC (PPPABC), challenging consecutive pricing orders issued by the BC Chicken Marketing Board for periods A-169 through A-174.
-
Dismissal: de Vries v Marker 15 Farm – Dismissal Order
Dismissal of farm practices complaint concerning noise from a propane cannon in Oliver to protect a vineyard from bird predation. Complainant withdrew complaint
-
Dismissal: Rittenhouse Produce v. British Columbia Interior Vegetable Marketing Board
Appeal of BC Interior Vegetable Marketing Board’s decision to deny Rittenhouse Produce the right to market carrots as in previous years.
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appellant withdrew its appeal of Order 10/03(a).
-
Decision: BC Vegetable Greenhouse I, L.P. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Letter regarding appellant withdrawal of appeal of Order 10/03(a).
-
Decision: Vanmar Poultry Ltd. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board
Appeal of the BCCMB’s decision to reduce production allotment for late levy payment. During appeal, BCCMB agreed to reverse the reduction and grant all requested remedies. Vanmar sought costs, but BCFIRB found the dispute had been settled and declined to award costs.
-
Decision: Hinch v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Withdrawn appeal of the BC SPCA claim for seizure costs.
-
Preliminary decision: Hinch v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Procedural decision regarding the withdrawal of an appeal concerning costs of seizure. The appeal was dismissed following the appellant’s acceptance of reimbursement for the costs.