This is not the document

Sometimes you may land on this page when you are trying to open a specific BCFIRB document. This page is not the document.

How to find the document

Use the following information to help you select the correct file:

  • Decision: A.K. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 24 dogs and one cat in White Rock following third-party surrender by the RCMP due to the animals being left unattended, running loose in the neighbourhood, and confined in crates without an available caregiver.

  • Decision: Whitta Farm et al v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of BC Chicken Marketing Board’s decision to discontinue ferry freight assistance to Vancouver Island commercial growers as a condition of incentive quota.

  • Preliminary decision: G. Wool & Sons Farm v. Outlander Poultry Farms Ltd.

    Complaint related to barn clean out timing, incinerator exhaust and odour, dust and noise from fans, and feed delivery timing at a poultry farm in Langley. The complaint was not referred to a hearing.

  • Decision: Wrede’s Mushroom Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Mushroom Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMuMB’s decision to cancel Wrede’s Mushroom Farm Ltd.’s grower licence for 1987. The appellant contested the cancellation following a previous fine for bootlegging.

  • Preliminary decision: Wright v. Lubchynski

    Complaint related to noise from a propane cannon used for bird control at a vineyard in Kelowna. The respondent applied to dismiss the complaint. The complaint proceeded to a hearing on the merits.

  • Decision: Whitta Farm et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of Chicken Board’s discontinuance of ferry freight assistance tied to incentive quota. Full reasons for decision issued, addressing history of freight assistance and sound marketing policy considerations.

  • Decision: Whaley Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to apply GEP rules to quota reallocated to Whaley Farms under the Regularization Program. Whaley Farms contested the application of the 10/10/10 and LIFO provisions, arguing it affected their ability to manage the quota. The decision was related to BCMMB’s Consolidated Order.

  • Decision: Townline Enterprises v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny agency status for marketing ‘mini’ hothouse cucumbers. Townline Enterprises sought exemption to market directly, citing concerns over Co-op’s marketing strategy. The decision was related to the marketing structure under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.

  • Decision: Sandhu Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Appeal of BCVMC’s alleged decision not to grant a packing house licence to Sandhu Farms Ltd. The appellant argued the denial affected their ability to market produce efficiently. The decision was related to the BCVMC’s letter dated August 7, 1987.

  • Decision: Western Food Processors Association v. British Columbia Vegetable Commission

    Appeal of BCVMC’s order to uphold a new price setting system. Western Food Processors Association challenged the removal of arbitration in favor of mediation in the price setting process. The decision was related to the “Order Regulating the Marketing of Regulated Product for Processing or Manufacture.”

1. Search for the document

  1. Use the search box at the top of the page
  2. Enter the document title
  3. Select Documents to limit your results (if necessary)
  4. Choose the document from the results list to open the PDF.

2. Browse all BCFIRB documents

You can also browse all available documents and decisions.

From that page, you can:

  • Filter by category (such as Animal custody appeal)
  • Filter by document type (such as Decision or Correspondence)
  • Filter by keyword

  • Decision: A.K. v. British Columbia Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

    Appeal of seizure and costs regarding 24 dogs and one cat in White Rock following third-party surrender by the RCMP due to the animals being left unattended, running loose in the neighbourhood, and confined in crates without an available caregiver.

  • Decision: Whitta Farm et al v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of BC Chicken Marketing Board’s decision to discontinue ferry freight assistance to Vancouver Island commercial growers as a condition of incentive quota.

  • Preliminary decision: G. Wool & Sons Farm v. Outlander Poultry Farms Ltd.

    Complaint related to barn clean out timing, incinerator exhaust and odour, dust and noise from fans, and feed delivery timing at a poultry farm in Langley. The complaint was not referred to a hearing.

  • Decision: Wrede’s Mushroom Farm Ltd. v. British Columbia Mushroom Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMuMB’s decision to cancel Wrede’s Mushroom Farm Ltd.’s grower licence for 1987. The appellant contested the cancellation following a previous fine for bootlegging.

  • Preliminary decision: Wright v. Lubchynski

    Complaint related to noise from a propane cannon used for bird control at a vineyard in Kelowna. The respondent applied to dismiss the complaint. The complaint proceeded to a hearing on the merits.

  • Decision: Whitta Farm et al. v. British Columbia Chicken Marketing Board

    Appeal of Chicken Board’s discontinuance of ferry freight assistance tied to incentive quota. Full reasons for decision issued, addressing history of freight assistance and sound marketing policy considerations.

  • Decision: Whaley Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to apply GEP rules to quota reallocated to Whaley Farms under the Regularization Program. Whaley Farms contested the application of the 10/10/10 and LIFO provisions, arguing it affected their ability to manage the quota. The decision was related to BCMMB’s Consolidated Order.

  • Decision: Townline Enterprises v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny agency status for marketing ‘mini’ hothouse cucumbers. Townline Enterprises sought exemption to market directly, citing concerns over Co-op’s marketing strategy. The decision was related to the marketing structure under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.

  • Decision: Sandhu Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission

    Appeal of BCVMC’s alleged decision not to grant a packing house licence to Sandhu Farms Ltd. The appellant argued the denial affected their ability to market produce efficiently. The decision was related to the BCVMC’s letter dated August 7, 1987.

  • Decision: Western Food Processors Association v. British Columbia Vegetable Commission

    Appeal of BCVMC’s order to uphold a new price setting system. Western Food Processors Association challenged the removal of arbitration in favor of mediation in the price setting process. The decision was related to the “Order Regulating the Marketing of Regulated Product for Processing or Manufacture.”