Industry: Vegetable
-
2026 June 03 Prokam Enterprises Ltd v BCVMC – Dismissal Order
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. withdrew their appeal therefore a dismissal order was issued.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to BCVMC – OPVML Agency Designation Review – Process Letter
BCFIRB outlines first step in review of BCVMC agency designation decision for OPV Marketing Ltd.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to BCVMC – Extension of Temporary Agency License for Village Fresh
BCFIRB extends temporary agency license for Village Fresh to allow adequate time to conduct its review of the BCVMC decision.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to BCVMC – Extension of temporary agency license for Village Fresh
BCFIRB extends the temporary agency license for Village Fresh until June 30, 2026 to allow adequate time for BCVMC to complete its agency application review.
-
Dismissal: GGFI Windset v BCVMC Decision Letter
An appeal with respect to the January 22, 2025 decision of the BCVMC to grant agency designation to MPL.
-
Directive: BCFIRB to regulated marketing boards and commissions – 2024 PARP Template and Reporting Guide
BCFIRB launches the 2024 Public Accountability and Reporting Program reporting cycle, shares submission deadlines, and provides the 2024 PARP template and reporting guide, including a summary of reporting changes and additions for 2024.
-
Decision: Mucci International Marketing Inc. v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Withdrawal for appeal of the BCVMC’s decision regarding a probationary agency designation and agency application,
-
Decision: Townline Enterprises v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to deny agency status for marketing ‘mini’ hothouse cucumbers. Townline Enterprises sought exemption to market directly, citing concerns over Co-op’s marketing strategy. The decision was related to the marketing structure under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.
-
Decision: Woodrow v. British Columbia Vegetable Marketing Commission
Appeal of BCVMC’s decision to refuse renewal of a packing house licence for Woodrow Bros. Farms. The appellant contested the refusal based on alleged bias and financial strain due to transportation costs.
-
Dismissal: Rittenhouse Produce v. British Columbia Interior Vegetable Marketing Board
Appeal of BC Interior Vegetable Marketing Board’s decision to deny Rittenhouse Produce the right to market carrots as in previous years.
