This is not the document

Sometimes you may land on this page when you are trying to open a specific BCFIRB document. This page is not the document.

How to find the document

Use the following information to help you select the correct file:

  • Directive: BCFIRB to regulated marketing boards and commissions – 2024 PARP Template and Reporting Guide

    BCFIRB launches the 2024 Public Accountability and Reporting Program reporting cycle, shares submission deadlines, and provides the 2024 PARP template and reporting guide, including a summary of reporting changes and additions for 2024.

  • Decision: Whaley Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to apply GEP rules to quota reallocated to Whaley Farms under the Regularization Program. Whaley Farms contested the application of the 10/10/10 and LIFO provisions, arguing it affected their ability to manage the quota. The decision was related to BCMMB’s Consolidated Order.

  • Decision: BCFIRB to BCMMB — Supervisory review of GEP quota allocation from Stewart to Verdonk

    BCFIRB retracts the B.C. Milk Marketing Board’s 2008 allocation of GEP quota, finding it failed to follow the regularization program by allocating quota without a joint application.

  • Decision: Van Herk v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s quota revocation decision to cancel the appellant’s quota and producer licence under the Graduated Entry Program. Central issues were whether the appellants were “actively engaged” in milk production and whether the Board’s process created procedural unfairness and bias concerns.

  • Decision: Teamsters Local Union No. 464 v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s milk transportation decision to restructure routes. Teamsters Local Union No. 464 argued job loss and disruption for its members, citing lack of transparency in the bidding process. The decision was related to BCMMB’s transportation policy and Consolidated Orders.

  • Letter: BCFIRB to supply-managed boards — Improving access to the supply management system and quota transfer

    BCFIRB provides an update on the management of specialty production and new entrant programs, including the implementation of orders by various supply-managed boards and commissions, and future processes for appeals.

  • Judicial review decision: Stewart v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board

    Judicial review of BCFIRB’s February 26, 2009, decision, which had dismissed an appeal of the B.C. Milk Marketing Board’s retraction of the Stewarts’ GEP quota due to non-compliance.

  • Decision: BCFIRB to Stakeholders — Review of mediated agreement between Stewart and Verdonk (Graduated Entry Program Regularization)

    BCFIRB reviews a mediated agreement between the Stewarts and Mr. Verdonk regarding the Graduated Entry Program (GEP) Regularization. This decision follows a B.C. Supreme Court order for BCFIRB to reconsider its June 2009 supervisory decision.

  • Decision: Stewart v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to retract quota under the Graduated Entry Program (GEP). The Stewarts argued compliance with GEP rules and sought to retain their quota until transitioning it to their own facility. The decision was related to the GEP Regularization process.

  • Specialty Market and New Entrant Submissions: Policy, Analysis, Principles and Directions

    BCFIRB outlines directions and principles for specialty and new entrant programs in B.C.’s supply-managed sectors, including eggs, chickens, turkeys, hatching eggs, and milk. The document details BCFIRB’s assessment of submissions from various boards, focusing on specialty market development, quota management and new entrant opportunities.

1. Search for the document

  1. Use the search box at the top of the page
  2. Enter the document title
  3. Select Documents to limit your results (if necessary)
  4. Choose the document from the results list to open the PDF.

2. Browse all BCFIRB documents

You can also browse all available documents and decisions.

From that page, you can:

  • Filter by category (such as Animal custody appeal)
  • Filter by document type (such as Decision or Correspondence)
  • Filter by keyword

  • Directive: BCFIRB to regulated marketing boards and commissions – 2024 PARP Template and Reporting Guide

    BCFIRB launches the 2024 Public Accountability and Reporting Program reporting cycle, shares submission deadlines, and provides the 2024 PARP template and reporting guide, including a summary of reporting changes and additions for 2024.

  • Decision: Whaley Farms Ltd. v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to apply GEP rules to quota reallocated to Whaley Farms under the Regularization Program. Whaley Farms contested the application of the 10/10/10 and LIFO provisions, arguing it affected their ability to manage the quota. The decision was related to BCMMB’s Consolidated Order.

  • Decision: BCFIRB to BCMMB — Supervisory review of GEP quota allocation from Stewart to Verdonk

    BCFIRB retracts the B.C. Milk Marketing Board’s 2008 allocation of GEP quota, finding it failed to follow the regularization program by allocating quota without a joint application.

  • Decision: Van Herk v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s quota revocation decision to cancel the appellant’s quota and producer licence under the Graduated Entry Program. Central issues were whether the appellants were “actively engaged” in milk production and whether the Board’s process created procedural unfairness and bias concerns.

  • Decision: Teamsters Local Union No. 464 v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s milk transportation decision to restructure routes. Teamsters Local Union No. 464 argued job loss and disruption for its members, citing lack of transparency in the bidding process. The decision was related to BCMMB’s transportation policy and Consolidated Orders.

  • Letter: BCFIRB to supply-managed boards — Improving access to the supply management system and quota transfer

    BCFIRB provides an update on the management of specialty production and new entrant programs, including the implementation of orders by various supply-managed boards and commissions, and future processes for appeals.

  • Judicial review decision: Stewart v. British Columbia Farm Industry Review Board

    Judicial review of BCFIRB’s February 26, 2009, decision, which had dismissed an appeal of the B.C. Milk Marketing Board’s retraction of the Stewarts’ GEP quota due to non-compliance.

  • Decision: BCFIRB to Stakeholders — Review of mediated agreement between Stewart and Verdonk (Graduated Entry Program Regularization)

    BCFIRB reviews a mediated agreement between the Stewarts and Mr. Verdonk regarding the Graduated Entry Program (GEP) Regularization. This decision follows a B.C. Supreme Court order for BCFIRB to reconsider its June 2009 supervisory decision.

  • Decision: Stewart v. British Columbia Milk Marketing Board

    Appeal of BCMMB’s decision to retract quota under the Graduated Entry Program (GEP). The Stewarts argued compliance with GEP rules and sought to retain their quota until transitioning it to their own facility. The decision was related to the GEP Regularization process.

  • Specialty Market and New Entrant Submissions: Policy, Analysis, Principles and Directions

    BCFIRB outlines directions and principles for specialty and new entrant programs in B.C.’s supply-managed sectors, including eggs, chickens, turkeys, hatching eggs, and milk. The document details BCFIRB’s assessment of submissions from various boards, focusing on specialty market development, quota management and new entrant opportunities.