Filter & Sort results
Search results for: “”
-
Submission: BCCMB to BCFIRB — Response to PPPABC’s confidentiality application (PDF, 189.3KB)
This letter is the BCCMB’s formal response opposing the PPPABC’s December 15, 2023, confidentiality order application.
-
Application: PPPABC to BCFIRB — Request for confidentiality order for pricing recommendation submissions (PDF, 249.4KB)
The PPPABC formally applies to BCFIRB for a confidentiality order under s. 42 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, seeking to file redacted evidence.
-
Submission: Prokam Enterprises Ltd. — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Phase 2 (PDF, 288.3KB)
Prokam Enterprises Ltd. submits written arguments challenging the jurisdiction and procedural fairness of Phase II of the supervisory review, which examines allegations of bad faith and unlawful conduct.
-
Letter: BCFIRB to Stakeholders — Process for PPPABC confidentiality application and submission deadline extension (PDF, 146.8KB)
Responding to the PPPABC’s December 5 request, BCFIRB outlines the formal application process for confidential submissions and extends the deadlines for all parties to submit on the BCCMB’s pricing recommendation.
-
Email: PPPABC to BCFIRB — Request for confidentiality measures for pricing submissions (PDF, 100.1KB)
Responding to BCFIRB’s submission process, the Primary Poultry Processors Association of BC requests clarification on confidentiality and suggests individual meetings to provide proprietary data on pricing impacts.
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Correction to Phase II submission (PDF, 125.4KB)
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. files a correction to its December 1 submission in the “Bad Faith” supervisory review, clarifying which lawsuit Commissioner Gerrard was named in.
-
Letter: BCfresh to BCFIRB — Phase II submission regarding Prokam’s Delivery Allocation (PDF, 657.4KB)
BCfresh Vegetables Inc. submits its Phase II position in the “Bad Faith” supervisory review, supporting Hearing Counsel’s recommendation that the B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission (VMC) must determine Prokam’s Delivery Allocation.
-
Decision: BCFIRB re: BCFresh application to adduce evidence in Phase II (PDF, 128.9KB)
Decision on BCFresh’s application to cite new evidence regarding Prokam’s Delivery Allocation (DA) in Phase II of the “Allegations of Bad Faith” supervisory review.
-
Submission: Andre Solymosi — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Phase 2 (PDF, 541.3KB)
B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission general manager Andre Solymosi provides written submissions regarding phase 2 of the supervisory review, proposing a charge for legal fees against Prokam Enterprises Ltd.
-
Submission: B.C. Vegetable Marketing Commission — Allegations of bad faith and unlawful activity — Phase 2 (PDF, 353.7KB)
The BCVMC provides written submissions regarding phase 2 of the supervisory review, asserting that Prokam Enterprises Ltd.’s allegations were made strategically to undermine the commission and proposing a charge for legal fees against Prokam.
