Filter & Sort results
Search results for: “”
-
Preliminary decision: Granberg v. Granberg and McKay (PDF, 114.6KB)
Complaint related to manure storage practices and water contamination. Case dismissed after complainants withdrew their complaint.
-
Preliminary decision: Cipes v. Adams (Waterside Farms) (PDF, 113.9KB)
Complaint related to noise from a broadcasting device. Complaint dismissed following a settlement agreement and withdrawal by the complainants.
-
Preliminary decision: Doppenberg v. Meier (PDF, 115.2KB)
Complaint related to noise from a bird scare device cannon at a dairy farm. Complaint dismissed as it was withdrawn following a settlement agreement.
-
Withdrawn: Brar Farms v. Windemere Farms (PDF, 114.4KB)
Complaint related to dust generated from chicken vents. Complaint dismissed as the parties reached a settlement and withdrew the complaint.
-
Preliminary decision: Little v. Wardlaw and Koteles (Koteles Farms) (PDF, 114.6KB)
Complaint related to odour and flies from Koteles Farms. Complaint dismissed following a settlement agreement and withdrawal by the complainant.
-
Preliminary decision: Cohen v. Elaraj and McNichol (PDF, 291.5KB)
Complaint related to rooster noise disturbance from a hobby farm. Complaint dismissed as the respondents were not operating a farm business under the FPPA.
-
Preliminary decision: Drummond v. Kray and Gibson (PDF, 260.1KB)
Complaint dismissed as the complainant failed to identify a farm business being conducted on the respondent’s property.
-
Decision: Warcup, Gee, Miller, Williamson, Wright, and Kokko v. Daybreak Farms (Terrace) Ltd. (PDF, 402.5KB)
Complaint related to fly disturbance from a commercial egg producer in Terrace. Complainants alleged improper manure management practices by Daybreak Farms. Complaint dismissed due to insufficient evidence linking the fly disturbance to the farm operation.
-
Preliminary decision: Walton v. Roslinsky (PDF, 304.9KB)
Complaint related to noise from a rooster in a small poultry operation. Complaint dismissed as the respondent’s activities do not constitute a farm business under the FPPA.
-
Decision: Gardiner and Paul v. Springbend Chicken Corp. (PDF, 384.0KB)
Complaint related to dust, odour, noise, and flies from a poultry operation in Grindrod.