Filter & Sort results
Search results for: “”
-
Decision: BCFIRB — Implementation and compliance of Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) (PDF, 190.7KB)
BCFIRB reviews the rationales from five commodity boards for not implementing Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) for biosecurity programs. BCFIRB rejects the rationales from the B.C. Turkey Marketing Board, B.C. Hog Marketing Commission, and B.C. Milk Marketing Board (BCMMB), and directs them to take further steps toward developing AMPs or justifying their positions.
-
Decision: Binnendyk, Boes, and Gelderman v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission (PDF, 124.4KB)
Appeal of BCHMC’s decision not to proceed with a price equalization program.
-
Decision: Supervisory review of the B.C. Hog Marketing Commission Price Equalization Program (PDF, 642.8KB)
BCFIRB conducted a supervisory review of the BCHMC’s price equalization program, to address price disparities between producers supplying different processors. The review identified governance issues, including unequal levy application and conflict of interest, and directed BCHMC to freeze the program and address these concerns.
-
Decision: Evans, Feather, and Bradley v. DeKleyne (PDF, 97.7KB)
Complaint related to odour, pests (flies and rats), and manure management from a hog operation in Nanaimo.
-
Decision: Fletcher’s Fine Foods Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission (PDF, 776.7KB)
Appeal of BCHMC’s decision to uphold the Respondent’s letter dated June 29, 1992. The Appellants contested the decision related to hog marketing orders. The decision was related to the allocation of British Columbia produced hogs for the Chinatown “hot hog market.”
-
Preliminary decision: Fletcher’s Fine Foods Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission (PDF, 724.4KB)
Appellants requested an interim stay of the BCHMC’s decision to deny them access to purchase B.C. hogs.
-
Decision: Fletcher’s Ltd. and Britco Export Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission (PDF, 4.1MB)
Appeal of BCHMC’s decision to impose a differential levy under Order 1/84.
-
Decision: Intercontinental Packers Ltd. v. British Columbia Hog Marketing Commission (PDF, 3.4MB)
The appeal concerns whether the BCHMC engaged in price fixing. Preliminary objections addressed include the timeliness of the Notice of Appeal and the validity of a supplementary Notice of Appeal. The decision relates to the BCHMC’s jurisdiction to propose a pricing formula for hogs under the Natural Products Marketing (BC) Act.