Filter & Sort results
Search results for: “”
-
Decision: Neveaux and Stevens v. Twoten Resources Ltd. (PDF, 183.3KB)
Complaint related to property flooding caused by cranberry harvest water runoff in Courtenay.
-
Decision: BCFIRB — Implementation and compliance of Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) (PDF, 190.7KB)
BCFIRB reviews the rationales from five commodity boards for not implementing Administrative Monetary Penalties (AMPs) for biosecurity programs. BCFIRB rejects the rationales from the B.C. Turkey Marketing Board, B.C. Hog Marketing Commission, and B.C. Milk Marketing Board (BCMMB), and directs them to take further steps toward developing AMPs or justifying their positions.
-
Decision: Sohi v. Malenstyn and DJM Farms Ltd. (PDF, 586.6KB)
Complaint related to dust, odour, and flooding from fill and manure management on a cranberry farm in Delta.
-
Preliminary decision: Sohi v. Malenstyn (PDF, 304.4KB)
Complaint related to dust, manure management, and flooding caused by a cranberry farm. Respondent’s request for a further adjournment is dismissed.
-
Preliminary decision: Sohi v. Malenstyn (PDF, 255.6KB)
Complaint related to dust, manure management and flooding from a cranberry operation and chicken manure storage. Ruled on proper serving of witness list and documents, and adjourned hearing due to scheduling conflicts with cranberry planting activities.
-
Decision: Hopcott and Middleton v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board (PDF, 21.5KB)
Appeal of BCMB’s decision to adjust marketing allocations. The appellants challenged the Cranberry Board’s failure to implement the BCMB’s directive to increase their allocations.
-
Decision: Hopcott d.b.a. Meadows Feedlot and Cloudburst Cranberries Ltd. v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board (PDF, 26.5KB)
Appeal of BCCMC’s quota allocation decision to adjust cranberry production quotas. The appellants argued that the BCCMC’s method of calculating the 2001 set aside was unfair and underestimated their production, impacting their ability to sell their crop.
-
Decision: Golden Eagle Ranch Inc. v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board (PDF, 8.0KB)
Appeal of British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board’s decision to grant approval to plant only 10 acres of cranberries instead of the requested 260 acres.
-
Decision: Golden Eagle Ranch Inc. v. British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board (PDF, 8.0KB)
Appeal of British Columbia Cranberry Marketing Board’s decision to grant approval to plant only 10 acres of cranberries instead of the requested 260 acres.